---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

In the two-way trading scenario of forex investment, while the learning and accumulation of professional knowledge is the foundation for building trading capabilities, traders must be wary of the cognitive rigidity or inflexible thinking that may result from over-reliance on book knowledge.

---

Some traders, in the long-term learning process, easily develop a cognitive inertia of "book supremacy." When encountering new market problems and changes, they habitually search for solutions from classic theories and historical cases. This way of thinking essentially confines decision-making logic to the framework of past experience, ignoring the dynamic evolution of the market environment. From the perspective of cognitive laws, the knowledge contained in books is mostly a summary and refinement of past market phenomena, reflecting the market logic and operating rules of a specific historical period. However, one of the core characteristics of the financial market is uncertainty and dynamic change. New market trends, trading models, and risk factors often arise under the interplay of multiple new variables. These new things have not yet been incorporated into the past knowledge system, and naturally, ready-made answers cannot be found in existing book content.
The development of the financial sector is itself a history of constantly breaking through traditional understandings and continuous innovation. From traditional offline trading models to the widespread adoption of electronic trading systems, from single spot trading to the booming derivatives market, each industry transformation stems from breaking through past experience and responding to new market demands. In their early stages, these transformations could not be clearly guided by historical records. As one of the most liquid and complex financial markets globally, the foreign exchange market exhibits even more pronounced dynamics and innovative characteristics. Exchange rate fluctuations are not only affected by traditional factors such as economic data and monetary policy, but also by emerging variables such as geopolitical events, new trends in cross-border capital flows, and the application of financial technology. The mechanisms and pathways of these emerging variables often exceed the scope of traditional textbook knowledge. For example, the core factor driving exchange rate fluctuations in a given year might be changes in trade patterns caused by the restructuring of global supply chains, while the following year, the market might be dominated by changes in capital flow patterns brought about by new financial instruments. If traders continue to use experience summarized from last year's specific market environment to deal with this year's new changes, they are likely to make biased decisions because they cannot adapt to the new market logic. This also confirms the reality in the forex trading field that "last year's experience is difficult to adapt to this year's market."
At a deeper level, the ability to innovate in two-way forex trading is essentially the ability to keenly capture and dynamically adapt to new market variables, rather than mechanically applying past knowledge. Successful traders are often able to maintain an open understanding of new market trends based on a solid knowledge base. They neither deny the basic value of book knowledge nor fall into the trap of empiricism, but rather construct trading strategies adapted to the current market by continuously observing new market dynamics and analyzing the impact logic of new variables. For example, when emerging assets like cryptocurrencies begin to have spillover effects on the traditional foreign exchange market, innovative traders will proactively study the linkage mechanisms between cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies, rather than being confined to the past analytical framework that only focused on fiat currency exchange rates. When high-frequency trading algorithms are increasingly used in the foreign exchange market, traders will explore how to use new technological tools to optimize their risk control models, rather than adhering to traditional manual trading decision-making models. This acceptance and exploration of new things is key to breaking through cognitive rigidity and achieving continuous improvement in trading capabilities. Only by breaking free from the mindset of "finding answers in the past" can one maintain long-term competitiveness in the ever-changing two-way foreign exchange market.

Foreign exchange traders' views on bottom-fishing and top-fishing will differ depending on their investment strategies.

---

In the two-way trading system of forex investment, discussions among traders about market views and trading strategies are normal exchanges. However, it's crucial to avoid getting bogged down in unfocused debates. These debates often lack clear definitions of trading cycles, risk appetite anchors, and investment objectives. Participants remain at a superficial level, discussing single trading behaviors or market judgments without considering their own trading frameworks or the other party's operational logic and holding periods. Ultimately, this not only fails to reach valuable consensus but can also waste considerable energy and even trigger irrational emotions due to conflicting viewpoints, negatively impacting subsequent trading decisions. In fact, the complexity of the forex market dictates that there is no "absolutely correct" view applicable to all traders. The rationality of any trading judgment must be examined within the specific trading scenario and perspective. Debates detached from perspective essentially ignore the market's diverse characteristics and naturally fail to generate practical value.
In two-way forex trading, the judgment of whether "buying at the bottom and selling at the top" is right or wrong also heavily depends on the trader's perspective. For long-term investors aiming for long-term asset allocation, buying at the bottom and selling at the top is often a reasonable choice consistent with their trading logic. The core strategy of long-term investors relies on their analysis of long-term factors such as macroeconomic cycles and monetary policy trends. They establish positions when exchange rates are at historically low levels (bottom fishing) or high levels (top fishing), holding these positions long-term while waiting for the exchange rate to revert to its intrinsic value, thus profiting from the long-term trend. For them, short-term market fluctuations causing unrealized gains or losses are not their primary concern; the key lies in the accuracy of their long-term trend judgment. Therefore, bottom fishing and top fishing are not only important methods for establishing long-term positions but also an inevitable choice based on long-term value judgments, becoming a fundamental criterion in their trading system.
However, for short-term traders aiming to capture short-term market fluctuations, bottom fishing and top fishing are highly likely to be high-risk and erroneous actions. Short-term traders' profit logic relies on accurately grasping intraday or short-term exchange rate fluctuations, pursuing quick profits from price differences. However, bottom-fishing and top-picking require precise judgment of the exchange rate's "bottom" and "top" points—these points are inherently highly subjective and uncertain. Short-term markets are influenced by factors such as funding and sentiment, causing exchange rates to fluctuate within or even break through key levels in so-called "bottom" or "top" areas. This can lead to short-term traders entering the market too early and getting trapped, or missing trading opportunities while waiting for precise entry points. Furthermore, short-term trading demands high capital turnover and stop-loss efficiency. The extended holding periods and increased risk exposure resulting from bottom-fishing and top-picking often contradict the risk control principles of short-term trading. Therefore, in the cognitive framework of short-term traders, bottom-fishing and top-picking are considered incorrect behaviors, based on their fundamental trading logic.
Essentially, the difference between long-term traders' belief that bottom-fishing and top-picking are correct, and short-term traders' belief that they are wrong, is not a matter of opposing viewpoints. Rather, it stems from fundamental differences in their trading cycles, risk tolerance, and profit models. Long-term traders trade time for space, willing to endure short-term fluctuations for long-term gains; short-term traders trade space for time, pursuing the certainty of short-term profits and rapid capital turnover. Both judgments are adaptations to their own trading frameworks and are reasonable from their respective perspectives; there is no absolute right or wrong. However, adopting a neutral, third-party perspective makes it easier to transcend the limitations of a single viewpoint and clearly see the logical support behind both judgments: understanding both the long-term trader's reliance on long-term trends and the short-term trader's avoidance of short-term risks. This leads to a deeper understanding of the objective law in the forex market that "position determines judgment," avoiding the cognitive trap of either/or thinking and viewing the rationality of different trading strategies from a more inclusive and rational perspective. This is crucial for traders to improve their trading systems and deepen their market understanding.

In the two-way trading field of forex investment, the perceived difficulty of this activity exhibits distinct stage differences for participating traders. Before achieving a cognitive breakthrough and grasping the core logic of market operation (i.e., what is commonly referred to as "enlightenment" or "awakening"), forex trading is often considered extremely challenging.

---

At this stage, traders are prone to blindly following market fluctuations, struggling to establish a stable trading system. Faced with complex exchange rate influencing factors and volatile market conditions, they often feel at a loss, their decisions are easily influenced by emotions, leading to frequent misjudgments and unsatisfactory trading results. Therefore, they deeply appreciate the "difficulty" of forex trading. However, when traders, through continuous learning, practical experience, and deep reflection, finally achieve "enlightenment" or "awakening," truly understanding the underlying logic and essence of the forex market, forex trading becomes relatively easier.
At this point, traders can grasp the core contradictions beyond the market surface, forming a clear trading logic and a mature decision-making framework. They maintain a more stable mindset when facing market fluctuations, can calmly handle various risks, and significantly improve the accuracy and effectiveness of their trading decisions, naturally experiencing the "ease" of forex trading.
The core reason for this difference in difficulty lies in the unique "decision-making flexibility" that forex two-way trading provides traders with—ample room for reversal and the right to patiently wait during the trading process. This contrasts sharply with most activities requiring immediate response. In most game scenarios, once participants enter the game, they must interact according to fixed rules, unable to choose to avoid or wait. External rules and the behavior of the participating group create a "forced drive," compelling participants to react instantly. For example, in gambling, once participants sit down at the table, they are trapped in a predicament where they cannot easily back down or quit midway. Unless they voluntarily concede and bear the losses, they can only passively follow the progress of the game. Similarly, in chess, once players are seated, they must take turns moving according to the rules. There is no opportunity to reverse a previous move, nor can they choose to pause the game and wait for a more favorable opportunity; every decision must be made instantly within the given context. Foreign exchange two-way trading completely breaks this constraint of "forced response." When market conditions are unfavorable and do not align with one's trading strategy, traders can choose to temporarily refrain from trading. When market trends are detrimental to their positions or expected returns, they can patiently wait for a more suitable entry or exit point. Throughout this process, no external force compels traders to take action, invest, or complete a transaction. This high degree of autonomy in decision-making is the key characteristic that distinguishes foreign exchange trading from other activities at the operational level.
Furthermore, it is worth exploring that business owners with a background in real-world investment (such as factory or company entrepreneurs), after fully understanding the operational principles of foreign exchange investment, often develop a profound perception that "foreign exchange trading is easier to operate than real-world business operations." This difference in perception stems from the fundamental differences between the two in terms of operating models, cost structures, and risk pressures. In the process of real-world investment, business owners need to build a complete operating system: not only do they need to recruit a large number of employees to form a team and bear continuous labor costs, but they also need to rent or purchase fixed business premises, pay rent, utilities, and other premises-related expenses, while simultaneously dealing with complex processes involving raw material procurement, production and processing, and market sales. If a real-economy project fails to achieve expected profits, or even if revenue cannot cover costs, it faces the risk of losses. Prolonged losses can lead to bankruptcy due to a broken cash flow. Throughout the entire operation, there is constant pressure and survival risk from fixed costs. Foreign exchange investment trading, however, completely eliminates these constraints. Traders do not need to bear fixed expenses such as labor and rent, and can operate solely through online trading platforms. If there are no clear trading opportunities or market conditions do not meet expectations, they can choose not to trade, incurring neither additional costs nor losses. Even during trading, there is no mandatory requirement to profit in the short term, lacking the urgent pressure and sense of crisis of "not making money could lead to a survival crisis" found in real-economy operations. The overall operational pressure is significantly lower than in real-economy investment. It is precisely based on this comparison of cost structure and risk pressure that, once entrepreneurs truly understand the operating principles of foreign exchange trading, they will clearly perceive its advantages in operational flexibility and risk control, thus forming the perception that "foreign exchange trading is easier than real-economy trading."

In the field of two-way forex trading, "knowing but not being able to do" remains a core obstacle that most traders need to overcome. This predicament is not an isolated case, but a common problem throughout a trading career.

---

Many traders, when first encountering forex trading techniques, can often grasp the theoretical framework and operational methods in a short time, even understanding the basic trading logic in just three days. However, achieving consistent and stable profits often requires up to ten years of practical experience. This huge time difference is essentially due to the gap between "knowing" and "doing." This gap does not stem from the superiority or inferiority of individual abilities, but is determined by the complexity of translating cognition into practice in trading. Therefore, this problem exists in the growth path of the vast majority of traders; there is no so-called "superiority or inferiority," and it is unnecessary to use this to judge the trading journey of others.
In successful cases of two-way forex trading, traders who can truly establish themselves long-term and achieve stable returns have almost all undergone more than ten years of continuous in-depth practice. It's not that these successful traders possess extraordinary talent or intellectual advantages, but rather that their long-term persistence and repeated practice have allowed them to gradually understand the inherent laws of market operation and master the core logic of trading decisions through countless trading attempts. This seemingly "clumsy" long-term investment has become the key to breaking through trading bottlenecks. From a practical perspective, before achieving clear success, the "long-term investment" of these traders who adhere to long-termism is often misunderstood as "clumsy." Only when they finally break through profit bottlenecks and achieve stable returns will this "clumsiness" be interpreted as "wise foolishness." If they consistently fail to overcome trading difficulties and achieve stable profits, then this "long-term investment" is likely to be continuously defined as "clumsy" by outsiders, which also reflects the "results-oriented" reality in the forex trading field.

On a forex broker's profit and loss statement, the most prominent cost item is "human depreciation."

---

They treat leverage like a free treat, scattering it in every welcome email for retail clients opening an account. In essence, they package greed, impatience, and wishful thinking into quantifiable liquidity. The few hundred dollars in a retail investor's account are no longer considered capital in the broker's risk management model; instead, they are a match magnified, used to ignite three layers of fuel: overnight interest, wider spreads, and liquidation due to margin calls. The higher the leverage, the faster the match burns, and the faster the broker's rent-collecting clock ticks.
Small-capital traders aren't unaware of the probability distribution of short-term riches; it's just that the scarcity of account balance directly grays out the option of "getting rich slowly." When available margin is less than the price of a cup of takeout coffee, rationality is judged as a luxury by the system and automatically shut down, leaving only the "gamble" background process running. The moment they click on 100x leverage, they're essentially connecting their hearts to the price chart. Every five-basis-point swing is projected onto their retina as a red-green flashing percentage of their account balance. Brokers don't need to predict direction; they only need to ensure volatility exists to sweep the ashes into their revenue after most of the trades have burned out.
The intraday true range of currency pairs is typically only a few tenths of a percentage point, yet it has to support the tens of percent profit margin required for 100x leverage. This means traders must bet on an extremely low probability of a large deviation to survive the current candlestick chart. Such deviations do exist, but they appear as random rewards, turning a very small number of survivors into mobile billboards, luring the next batch of traders in. If the survivors don't know when to stop, their profits will be re-carved into losses by spreads and slippage in the subsequent fluctuations, because the position size has been instantly inflated by huge profits, and the market only needs to return to its original position to trigger a margin call. So-called "luck" is merely an interest-free loan from brokers to traders, which must ultimately be repaid through margin calls. Unless the account is permanently frozen, the market will always find that unpaid receipt in some future candlestick chart.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---